Analysis of the Government Procurement Case and Winning Bid Solution for Foton Fengjing Service Vehicles in Yueyang City In 2025, a municipal sanitation department in Yueyang City, Hunan Province, planned to procure a batch of Foton Fengjing service vehicles to enhance road inspection and emergency response capabilities within its jurisdiction. Following an open tender process and comprehensive technical evaluation, Chengli Special Purpose Vehicle Co., Ltd. was selected as the supplier, providing a hybrid configuration comprising both fuel-powered and battery-electric models. This article offers a detailed interpretation of the procurement case from perspectives including total cost of ownership (TCO) comparison, operational scenario differentiation, and charging infrastructure requirements—and draws upon Chengli’s extensive experience in government procurement to provide practical reference for similar projects. I. Project Background and Procurement Requirements According to publicly released tender information, the procurement targeted core tasks including sanitation inspection, equipment maintenance, and small-scale emergency support. The required vehicles needed to be highly maneuverable, moderately sized, and capable of accommodating basic tools and personnel. A total of 10 units were procured, with a budget cap of approximately RMB 3.407 million (i.e., ~RMB 300,000 per unit). After comparative evaluation of proposals from multiple suppliers, Chengli Special Purpose Vehicle secured the contract based on its compliant official announcements (e.g., standardized technical platforms such as model CLW5070GSSD6) and proven track record in government procurement services. The final delivery comprised six fuel-powered Foton Fengjing service vehicles and four battery-electric versions. Customer feedback confirmed stable post-deployment performance, with both fuel efficiency and electric driving range meeting daily operational requirements. II. Cost Comparison: Fuel-Powered vs. Battery-Electric Models Chengli’s core strategy in this procurement was to match vehicle types to distinct operational scenarios—avoiding a one-size-fits-all approach. Below is a cost comparison between fuel-powered and battery-electric Foton Fengjing models, based on publicly available tender data and local procurement practices: | Comparison Item | Fuel-Powered (Foton Fengjing) | Battery-Electric (Foton Fengjing EV) | Notes | |------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------| | Purchase Price (incl. tax & delivery) | ~RMB 180,000–220,000 | ~RMB 280,000–320,000 | Battery cost increases EV price by ~50% | | 5-Year Fuel/Charging Cost | ~RMB 120,000 (20,000 km/year; fuel price: RMB 8/L) | ~RMB 40,000 (20,000 km/year; electricity: RMB 0.8/kWh) | EV saves ~RMB 80,000 over 5 years | | 5-Year Maintenance Cost | ~RMB 30,000 (engine, transmission, etc.) | ~RMB 15,000 (battery thermal management, motor servicing) | Simpler EV drivetrain reduces maintenance needs | | 5-Year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) | ~RMB 330,000–370,000 | ~RMB 335,000–375,000 | TCOs are broadly comparable; EV adoption benefits from subsidies | | Residual Value (after 5 years) | ~RMB 60,000–80,000 | ~RMB 40,000–60,000 | Mature second-hand market favors fuel-powered vehicles | | Suitable Scenarios | Long-distance inspection, cross-district operations, areas lacking charging infrastructure | In-city short-haul inspection, fixed routes, locations with reliable charging access | Complementary deployment strategy | Note: Figures above are reference estimates derived from Yueyang-specific procurement practices and publicly disclosed tender data. Actual prices may vary depending on configuration, regional subsidy policies, and market fluctuations. III. Operational Scenario Differences and Configuration Strategy In this case, fuel-powered and battery-electric vehicles were assigned to distinct operational roles: Fuel-Powered Models (6 units):