News & Updates
Cases
Chengli Manufacturer's Ford Transit V362 Service Vehicle Project in Yantai City: A Case Study
Summary
Yantai Government Procurement Case for Ford Transit V362 Service Vehicles: In-depth Analysis of the Winning Bid — In early 2025, a municipal sanitation department in Yantai issued a procurement notice for two Ford Transit V362 service vehicles, with
Yantai Government Procurement Case for Ford Transit V362 Service Vehicles: In-depth Analysis of the Winning Bid
In early 2025, a municipal sanitation department in Yantai issued a procurement notice for two Ford Transit V362 service vehicles, with a budget capped at approximately RMB 398,000. The vehicles were intended for routine inspections, equipment transportation, and emergency response. After multiple rounds of evaluation, Chengli Special Purpose Vehicle Co., Ltd. secured the contract with its OEM-based modification solution, complete official vehicle announcements (e.g., model CLW5040XJH6), and comprehensive after-sales service—successfully delivering two units. Customer feedback highlighted stable vehicle performance and meticulous modification details. This article uses this case as a benchmark to deconstruct how maximum scores can be achieved across different evaluation stages—from tender scoring dimensions—providing practical reference for similar procurement projects.
I. Tender Scoring Dimension Breakdown: Total Score = 100 Points
Based on publicly available tender information and local procurement practices, the project’s evaluation criteria were typically divided into three components: Technical Score (50 points), Commercial Score (30 points), and Service Score (20 points). The detailed breakdown is as follows:
| Scoring Dimension | Points | Key Evaluation Criteria | Chengli’s Winning Strategy |
|-------------------|--------|--------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Technical Score | 50 | Chassis performance, modification craftsmanship, compliance with official vehicle announcements (Type Approval), functional configuration | OEM Ford Transit V362 chassis + full compliance with MIIT announcement parameters (e.g., model CLW5040XJH6) |
| Commercial Score | 30 | Reasonableness of quotation, enterprise qualifications, past performance cases, delivery timeline | Direct factory sales (no intermediaries); cost savings of RMB 8,000–15,000 vs. 4S dealerships for identical configurations; delivery within 7–15 days |
| Service Score | 20 | After-sales responsiveness, spare parts availability, operator training, warranty duration | Chassis covered under Ford’s nationwide warranty; superstructure supported by lifetime service; spare parts shipped within 24 hours |
In the Yantai case, Chengli’s team conducted meticulous preparation for each scoring dimension, ultimately achieving a leading composite score.
II. Maximizing the Technical Score: OEM-Based Modification and Regulatory Compliance
The technical score constitutes the most critical component in government procurement, typically carrying the highest weight. For the Ford Transit V362 service vehicle project, evaluators focused on the following key aspects:
1. Chassis and Modification Craftsmanship
The Ford Transit V362 chassis is renowned for its robust power output (2.0T diesel engine), agile handling, and high interior space utilization. Chengli Special Purpose Vehicle strictly adhered to original equipment manufacturer (OEM) electrical interfaces and load-bearing structural specifications during modification—ensuring no compromise to chassis integrity. For instance, internal shelving, tool cabinets, and power systems were designed using modular layouts, satisfying daily inspection and equipment transport requirements while reserving dedicated interfaces for emergency lighting and communications.
2. Announcement and Parameter Compliance
Per the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) official vehicle announcement data (e.g., 108 fully documented model specifications), all Chengli-provided vehicle models carry complete national Type Approval certifications—enabling standard registration, annual inspection, and commercial operation. In the Yantai case, evaluators verified key parameters—including overall length, height, and kerb weight—against official announcements. Chengli’s submission matched all announced specifications precis
