News & Updates
Cases
On-site Delivery and Real Vehicle Configuration Display of Chengli Manufacturer's Foton Fengjing Service Vehicle in Luoyang City
Summary
Government Procurement Case of Foton Fengjing Service Vehicles in Luoyang: In-depth Interpretation of Winning Bid Proposal and Evaluation Criteria — In 2025, the Urban Management Bureau of a district in Luoyang City issued a procurement notice for Fo
Government Procurement Case of Foton Fengjing Service Vehicles in Luoyang: In-depth Interpretation of Winning Bid Proposal and Evaluation Criteria — In 2025, the Urban Management Bureau of a district in Luoyang City issued a procurement notice for Foton Fengjing service vehicles, with a budget cap of approximately RMB 391,000, aiming to procure two units for daily inspection and emergency support. Following open tendering, Chengli Special Purpose Vehicle Co., Ltd. was awarded and delivered the vehicles. This article dissects the tender evaluation dimensions and, drawing on Chengli’s experience in similar projects, explains how to formulate a high-scoring winning bid proposal.
I. Breakdown of Tender Evaluation Dimensions: From Announcement to Implementation
According to local procurement practices in Luoyang, tenders for such sanitation service vehicles typically adopt the “Comprehensive Evaluation Method”, with a total score of 100 points divided into three major categories: Technical Score (50 points), Commercial Score (30 points), and Service Score (20 points). The specific evaluation criteria for this case are as follows:
Evaluation Dimension | Full Marks | Key Evaluation Points | Typical Deduction Items
---|---|---|---
Technical Score | 50 | Vehicle specifications (chassis, engine, body-upfit configuration), consistency with official announcement, environmental compliance | Non-compliant specifications, absence of China VI emission certification, expired announcement
Commercial Score | 30 | Reasonableness of quotation, enterprise qualifications, similar project performance (within the last 3 years) | Quotation deviating significantly from budget, lack of municipal contract references, incomplete qualifications
Service Score | 20 | After-sales response time, spare parts supply, training plan, warranty period | Insufficient service network coverage, no local service commitment
This procurement explicitly required the vehicle chassis to be from the Foton Fengjing series and compliant with China VI emission standards. Leveraging its strategic partnership with Foton’s original equipment manufacturer (OEM) chassis division, Chengli Special Purpose Vehicle supplied the CLW5070GSSD6 model service vehicle—fully aligned with the announced technical parameters (referencing MIIT announcement data)—and thus incurred zero deductions in the technical evaluation segment.
II. Maximizing the Technical Score: Precise Matching of Specifications and Official Announcement
The technical score is critical to bid success. In this case, bidders were required to ensure the following:
• Chassis Consistency: The Foton Fengjing service vehicle must utilize an OEM chassis, with engine model, wheelbase, and other parameters fully consistent with those listed in the official announcement. Chengli’s supplied chassis were all sourced directly from Foton’s OEM production line, accompanied by chassis certificates of conformity and nationwide warranty coverage.
• Body-upfit Configuration: The service vehicle must be equipped with tool cabinets, warning lights, storage boxes, etc. Chengli customized the interior layout per the procuring entity’s requirements, optimizing spatial utilization.
• Environmental Compliance: Full compliance with China VI emission standards, supported by an onboard Environmental Information List. Given Luoyang’s stringent local environmental monitoring requirements, Chengli proactively submitted the CLW5070GSSD6 model’s official emission test report, thereby avoiding any technical-score deductions.
Based on publicly available tender information, Chengli achieved 48 out of 50 points in the technical evaluation—losing only 2 points on minor aesthetic design details—yet sustaining no critical deficiencies. This outcome reflects Chengli’s strict adherence to announced specifications: its product database covers 946 models (e.g., CLW5180GSSD6), ensuring every vehicle achieves “zero-error” alignment with tender requirements.
III. Compe
