Government Procurement Case and Bid-Winning Solution Analysis for Foton Fengjing Service Vehicles in Hohhot As urban management becomes increasingly refined, a district Urban Management Bureau in Hohhot recently completed the procurement of Foton Fengjing service vehicles. These vehicles are primarily used for municipal inspections, emergency repairs, and material transportation, requiring excellent off-road capability, fuel economy, and adaptability to extreme cold environments. Based on a real tender case, this article compares the cost-effectiveness and suitability of fuel-powered versus battery-electric service vehicles, analyzes Chengli Special Purpose Vehicle’s winning bid proposal, and provides reference guidance for similar procurement projects. I. Procurement Background and Operational Requirements The Urban Management Bureau oversees daily inspection and facility maintenance across approximately 50 km² within its jurisdiction. Service vehicles must frequently navigate urban streets, narrow alleys, and some suburban roads. During winter (November to March), temperatures regularly fall below -20°C, with extreme lows reaching -30°C—imposing stringent requirements on vehicle starting performance and hydraulic system stability. The procurement budget is capped at approximately RMB 338,000, with two service vehicles planned for acquisition. Per the tender documents, vehicles must meet the following key specifications: Chassis: Foton Fengjing series, compliant with China VI emission standards Powertrain: Diesel or pure electric drive, equipped with freeze-resistant start functionality Vehicle dimensions: Approx. 5.3 m (L) × 1.7 m (W) × 2.0 m (H); internal cargo compartment volume ≥ 3 m³ Standard equipment: Heating & cooling air conditioning, hydraulic rear lift gate, reversing radar After-sales service: Nationwide chassis warranty; lifetime service for upfitting components II. Diesel vs. Battery-Electric: Cost and Operational Suitability Comparison During tender evaluation, suppliers submitted proposals for both diesel and battery-electric variants. A comparative analysis is conducted across three dimensions—acquisition cost, operational expenses, and winter adaptability—based on publicly available tender data and industry benchmarks. Comparison Dimension Diesel Variant (Foton Fengjing G9) Battery-Electric Variant (Foton Fengjing EV) Acquisition Price (Reference Tender Data) Approx. RMB 115,000/unit Approx. RMB 182,000/unit Subsidized Final Price (Including Upfitting) Approx. RMB 128,000/unit Approx. RMB 165,000/unit Annual Operating Cost (Based on 20,000 km/year) Approx. RMB 12,000 (fuel + maintenance) Approx. RMB 5,000 (electricity + maintenance) Winter Range/Fuel Consumption Impact Fuel consumption increases by ~15–20%; requires -35# diesel Range reduction of ~30–40%; pre-heating system required Hydraulic System Stability (Low-Temperature) Requires low-temperature hydraulic oil; normal startup Reduced battery performance; lower hydraulic pump efficiency Charging Infrastructure Requirements No special requirements; refueling at standard gas stations Requires dedicated charging piles or reliance on public fast-charging stations Total 5-Year Cost (Acquisition + Operations) Approx. RMB 188,000/unit Approx. RMB 190,000/unit Conclusion: In Hohhot’s extreme cold environment, the diesel variant offers lower acquisition cost and superior winter adaptability; its total 5-year cost is nearly identical to that of the battery-electric variant. Although the battery-electric version incurs lower operating costs, its significant winter range degradation and insufficient charging infrastructure (low public charger density in the region) represent major limitations. Ultimately, the procuring entity selected the diesel variant. III. Operational Scenario Differentiation Advantageous Scenarios for Diesel Variant: Cold-weather engine start: Equipped with electrically heated fuel filter and intake air preheating system